Skip to Page Content

 
719-255-3296 | refdesk@uccs.edu
 

Kraemer Family Library

Information Literacy Program Assessment

Assessment Philosophy

Programmatic assessment incorporates a variety of methods and measures so that conclusions may be corroborated, and stronger evidence of quality may be provided. Because assessment is strongly linked to planning, it should be designed to provide information that can be used to improve services, and should be a continuous, iterative process. Coordination of assessment with teaching faculty is a strategic goal of this program, because student learning outcomes are a shared responsibility.

Assessment Methods

Lindauer (2004) identifies three areas of information literacy assessment that can be used to document programmatic quality at a variety of levels. These include program components, learning environment, and student learning outcomes. All three areas overlap, and one particular method of assessment could easily fit into more than one area. For example, Lindauer notes that program components are really part of the formal learning environment, but are separated to emphasize the connection between learners and formal curriculum, and to stress the importance of instructional activities. Below are specific methods of assessment that have been or are currently being developed for the UCCS Information Literacy Program. Following that is a sample matrix (adapted from Lindauer, 1997) that uses outcomes, indicators, and assessment methods; this regimen may be adapted and applied to all segments of the assessment process, as well as to individual sessions or courses. (The sample below is a 'big picture' example.)

SAMPLE ASSESSMENT MATRIX

Outcome

Indicator

Data Collection Method

Faculty-librarian relationship is formalized, and tangible results of it are demonstrated by assignments using library/information resources across the curriculum

Descriptive report about number, type, extent of library research and information literacy-related assignments.

Syllabi analysis; library use/instruction statistics analysis

Syllabi and course assignments include information literacy skills development through various learning activities and use of library/learning resources

Descriptive report summarizing number, type, extent of library research information literacy related assignments

Course assignments and syllabi analysis

Active learning strategies (i.e.,problem-solvingassignments, group work; hands-on assignments) using a variety of information resources areused

Descriptive report summarizing number, type, purpose and student opinion about effects of various teaching methods

Syllabi analysis; peerobservation; student survey/self-assessment

Information literacy learning outcomes are included at the course and program levels for general education and otheracademic programs

Descriptive report summarizing number, type, extent of library research information literacy related outcomes for various programs on campus

Curriculum documentanalysis

Program completion and graduation requirements include demonstration ofinformation literacy competencies

Descriptive report summarizing library related questions from institutional assessment documents and general education requirements

Institutional assessmentanalysis of library-relatedquestions; analysis ofgeneral educationaldocuments

Campus general education andassessment plans include information literacy learning outcomes and ways todemonstrate progress and achievement of specific levels of information literacy

Descriptive report summarizing number, type, extent of library research information literacy related outcomes for general education and assessment oncampus

Curriculum documentanalysis; departmentassessment plan analysis