| Title: |
The
Professional Plan for Faculty |
|
Source: |
Vice President for Academic Affairs
and Research |
|
Prepared by: |
Assistant Vice President for Academic
Affairs |
|
Approved by: |
Dave Groth |
|
Application: |
All Campuses |
|
Effective Date: |
July 1, 1998 |
|
Replaces: |
NA |
INTRODUCTION
Discussions during academic year 1996-97 regarding tenure
and post-tenure review, by a committee of faculty and
administrators from the four campuses of the University
of Colorado, led to a recommendation, among others, that
the University institute a practice of having faculty
prepare and keep updated a professional plan. This
administrative policy statement establishes the
requirement for the professional plan.
The Professional Plan is designed to provide a clear
statement of a faculty member's goals and the nature of
effort to be made in the areas of teaching,
research/creative work, and service. Professional Plans
make clear to primary units and other evaluative bodies
what the faculty member has set as his/her goals. The
Plan should be developed in consultation with the primary
unit so that the faculty member's planned activities,
when combined with those of other faculty in the unit,
result in the primary unit meeting its responsibilities
to students and the university.
Faculty are assigned workloads made up of specified
percentages of effort for teaching, research/creative
work, and service. They are evaluated proportionally on
their performance in these areas . The Laws of the
Regents state that, in evaluating faculty performance in
order to determine salaries, "equal consideration shall
be given to teaching and research or other creative work;
in addition, service to the state and nation shall be
considered" (Article
11.A.2 (B)), unless there is a
differentiated workload agreement. Primary units and
colleges/schools interpret and define work roles in
teaching, research/creative work, and service that are
appropriate to the needs of the unit. For example, some
colleges or schools might have heavy service
requirements, others might have mandates for clinical
activities.
Within the framework of assigned duties of the primary
unit, there is considerable flexibility in determining
how the teaching, research/creative work, and service
needs of the unit are to be met. Individual faculty have
differing measures of choice in determining their
assignments for these three areas of
responsibility:
- In the area of research,
faculty have complete freedom of choice of topics and
methods of research; the principle of academic freedom
guarantees this choice.
- In teaching, faculty must
contribute to meeting the department's needs for
appropriate numbers of courses at various levels and in
various subjects; however, faculty usually control
course organization and content and teaching
methods.
- In service, the faculty
member usually has a wide choice of departmental,
college, university, professional, and community
service activities.
STATEMENT OF POLICIES
1. The primary purposes of the Professional Plan are to
encourage faculty development and to assure
accountability. The Professional Plan should provide an
individually prepared blueprint that aids in evaluating
performance, during both annual review and post-tenure
review. The Professional Plan is designed to communicate
the faculty member's teaching, research/creative work,
and service goals and to explain how these goals support
the needs of the primary unit and
the college/school. Projections made in the Plan, when
compared to the faculty member's progress and
achievements, provide one basis for evaluating the
faculty member's professional performance.
2. At the time of annual merit evaluation and also during
post-tenure review (and Extensive Review), the primary
unit evaluation committee will review the Professional
Plan (and any revisions or updates to the Plan) and
compare its goals to the actual achievements of the
faculty member to date. The Professional Plan is the
personally tailored workplan of the faculty member. When
examined alongside the established expectations of the
primary unit and college/school, the Professional Plan
gives a more complete picture of that faculty member's
goals and achievements. (Faculty with overly ambitious
plans should not be punished, nor should faculty with
unambitious plans be rewarded.)
3. Primary units and/or colleges and schools shall
develop guidelines for and models of Professional Plans
to give faculty members an indication of what might be
included in a Professional Plan. Deans must review and
approve unit guidelines.
4. The Professional Plan should contain clear statements
of the proportion of effort to be given to teaching,
research/creative work, and service and should be
accompanied by a differentiated workload agreement if the
Plan calls for a distribution of effort different from
the primary unit's standard assignment. Depending upon
the discipline, Plans may describe particular goals or
may provide more generalized goals.
5. In each department/unit, all faculty professional
plans shall be reviewed. In the area of teaching, the
primary unit head or appropriate department/unit
committee (as determined by primary unit policy) must
approve the particular teaching and advising assignment
in order that the teaching needs of the department are
met. In the area of research and creative work, the
head/committee may comment upon the adequacy,
feasibility, or wisdom of the Plan, but not formally
approve or disapprove it. In the area of service, each
college/school shall determine whether primary unit
heads/committees will comment on or formally approve the
service assignment.
6. Professional Plans must be kept current. Significant
changes, such as being awarded a large grant to work in a
new area of scholarly inquiry, or winning a fellowship to
teach or research
abroad for a semester, should be incorporated into a
revision of the Plan as soon as possible.
The updated Plan must be provided to the primary unit
head/committee and commented upon/signed as needed. Deans
are responsible for insuring that the Professional Plans
of the faculty in their college/school are updated at
least once per year. Campuses may incorporate the
Professional Plan into the annual performance evaluation
form if they so desire.
7. Tenure-track faculty, beginning in their second year
at the University, will prepare a Professional Plan. This
Plan should be designed to set goals in teaching,
research/creative work, and service that help the faculty
member progress toward tenure. The senior faculty of the
primary unit have a special obligation to assist junior
faculty in the development of Professional Plans that
produce the scholarly and pedagogical growth and
achievement needed to attain tenure. However, untenured
faculty must keep in mind that achievement of
departmentally-approved professional plan goals does not
ensure the award of tenure. The tenure decision is made
by representatives of the entire campus and by the Board
of Regents. That decision is based upon a broad judgment
of the cumulative product and promise of a faculty
member. Faculty members who have been tenured, but have
not been promoted to full professor, should keep in mind
the requirements for promotion when writing their
Professional Plans.
8. All campuses must develop campus policies and
procedures to implement the Professional Plan by July 15,
1998. The campus chancellors will report on the progress
of implementation at the September, 1998, meeting of the
Board of Regents.
9. In order to assess the success of this policy in terms
of enhancing faculty development and accountability, the
vice president for academic affairs and research will
gather information from the faculty and administration
and report to the Board and the Faculty Council in
December of 1999. If the report identifies the need for
change, the policy can be modified or revised at that
time. Thereafter, evaluations of the effectiveness of
this policy may be undertaken at the discretion of the
Regents.
APS Home page | APS
Index | Search
| Table of
Contents - Personnel
Comments
|