Suzanne Byerley
Library Instruction Coordinator
719-255-3290
sbyerley@uccs.edu
Programmatic assessment incorporates a variety of methods and measures so that conclusions may be corroborated, and stronger evidence of quality may be provided. Because assessment is strongly linked to planning, it should be designed to provide information that can be used to improve services, and should be a continuous, iterative process. Coordination of assessment with teaching faculty is a strategic goal of this program, because student learning outcomes are a shared responsibility.
Lindauer (2004) identifies three areas of information literacy assessment that can be used to document programmatic quality at a variety of levels. These include program components, learning environment, and student learning outcomes. All three areas overlap, and one particular method of assessment could easily fit into more than one area. For example, Lindauer notes that program components are really part of the formal learning environment, but are separated to emphasize the connection between learners and formal curriculum, and to stress the importance of instructional activities. Below are specific methods of assessment that have been or are currently being developed for the UCCS Information Literacy Program. Following that is a sample matrix (adapted from Lindauer, 1997) that uses outcomes, indicators, and assessment methods; this regimen may be adapted and applied to all segments of the assessment process, as well as to individual sessions or courses. (The sample below is a 'big picture' example.)
|
SAMPLE ASSESSMENT MATRIX |
||
|
Outcome |
Indicator |
Data Collection Method |
|
Faculty-librarian relationship is formalized, and tangible results of it are demonstrated by assignments using library/information resources across the curriculum |
Descriptive report about number, type, extent of library research and information literacy-related assignments. |
Syllabi analysis; library use/instruction statistics analysis |
|
Syllabi and course assignments include information literacy skills development through various learning activities and use of library/learning resources |
Descriptive report summarizing number, type, extent of library research information literacy related assignments |
Course assignments and syllabi analysis |
|
Active learning strategies (i.e.,problem-solving assignments, group work; hands-on assignments) using a variety of information resources areused |
Descriptive report summarizing number, type, purpose and student opinion about effects of various teaching methods |
Syllabi analysis; peer-observation; student survey/self-assessment |
|
Information literacy learning outcomes are included at the course and program levels for general education and other academic programs |
Descriptive report summarizing number, type, extent of library research information literacy related outcomes for various programs on campus |
Curriculum document analysis |
|
Program completion and graduation requirements include demonstration of information literacy competencies |
Descriptive report summarizing library related questions from institutional assessment documents and general education requirements |
Institutional assessment analysis of library-related questions; analysis of general educational documents |
|
Campus general education and assessment plans include information literacy learning outcomes and ways to demonstrate progress and achievement of specific levels of information literacy |
Descriptive report summarizing number, type, extent of library research information literacy related outcomes for general education and assessment oncampus |
Curriculum document analysis; department assessment plan analysis |
